![harrison mixbus 32c 4.1 harrison mixbus 32c 4.1](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/bGYhv40CD5Y/maxresdefault.jpg)
In my own use-case I run a modest i5 processor (four core 3.2 GHz) with a fairly modest graphics card. So far Intel still has me looking at them.Ī little off-topic here, but I'm wondering where are the "low-hanging" gains to run VST stuff more capably/efficiently? Zebra2 and Omnisphere need single core performance. I would have gone with AMD but they still havent said anything about a quad.Įxtra cores even hyperthreading just diminishes the focus audio apps need on faster GHz and brute strength.
HARRISON MIXBUS 32C 4.1 MAC
Since AMD a few developers have decided to abandon Mac all together, like Melda, who wrote a rather convincing article for his reasons.īut this only means developers now have AMD and its very active firmware crews, and Intel as choices. And Intels approach has been what developers have focused on. SSE4, AVX and AVX 2 is what our ASIO Apps are benefitting from. Sure like AMD but I’ve got my eyes on the i3 10350k 4.1 Quad due out next Spring. I know Ive always like the fastest biggest stuff but I havent needed more CPU Power since the first i7’s.Īlong the way PianoTeq Kontakt, Zebra2 and Omnisphere made their apps more efficient so even my i7 4790k now is 50% ror my common workload. AMD seems to be working with Scope too according to a couple guys using them here.